#FILEMAKER PRO FOR MAC AND FOR WINDOWS MAC#

For instance the standard test results from connecting to Mac Studio over LAN highlighted in the image above show just around 10% better overall score. Of course, the actual impact on your solution depends on how heavily you rely on the features that got better. As you can already verify yourself on the BenchTest homepage, FileMaker 19.5 scored better than 19.4 in almost all cases.

So I performed the standard test in BenchTest on 16 different setups, to compare them to FileMaker 19.4 running on the same setup. Not all but some of these changes, such as server-side summary fields or bigger memory cache of the server-side scripting engine, should have impact on the BenchTest results, so I was really curious how big the impact will be. The Save a Copy as XML script step can now be used on server and runs much faster than on client there.New function JSONGetElementType can be used to quickly check for JSON validity without having the whole JSON parsed.Slowdown caused by server-side scripts working with containers on Ubuntu 18 was fixed.Memory leak of Web Publishing Engine using card windows was fixed.Nginx is used instead of Apache for web publishing on Ubuntu 20.FileMaker WebDirect: Performance with multiple concurrent connections has improved.Layout cascading style sheets ( CSS) are now cached in FileMaker Server (affects web publishing).You can now use parallel backups to reduce downtime and improve performance.The FileMaker Server scripting engine has an increased memory cache from 64 MB to 256 MB.Summary fields for hosted custom apps can now be processed by FileMaker Server.

When focusing on performance, the following points deserve your attention:

#FILEMAKER PRO FOR MAC AND FOR WINDOWS UPDATE#

The update includes around 400 bug fixes and several useful new features. Just reading the whole release notes for FileMake Pro and FileMaker Server takes several minutes. New version 19.5 of the whole FileMaker platform was released last week and it's significant. If you try BenchTest on your own and submit your test results, they will usually appear on the BenchTest homepage automatically within a minute or so. In addition to the tests I performed myself, 156 test results got submitted by the community since then with the total of 228 results published on our website at the time I am writing this. If you haven't attended the meeting, you can register to watch the whole recording now: 1.During the meeting I revealed the new version of BenchTest and explained how you can use it yourself to test your own FileMaker configuration performance and compare it to others.

If you’d like to consider another program that could better fit your needs, here are 10 FileMaker Pro alternatives. However, FileMaker Pro also has its cons, like glitches when loading, licensing costs that add up quickly, and a less user-friendly interface than some other platforms on the market. And since it imports CSV and XML files and connects with SQL data, you can incorporate work you’ve already completed. Thankfully, no-code app builders like FileMaker Pro (now Claris FileMaker Pro) can help your business create an app in just a few steps, whether you need help tracking inventory or organizing projects.įileMaker Pro touts drag-and-drop features, built-in templates, and the ability to create and run apps on both Windows and macOS.

#FILEMAKER PRO FOR MAC AND FOR WINDOWS SOFTWARE#

In fact, once you tally up the total people hours and technology expenses required to create an app, software development can cost you anywhere between $50,000 and $250,000, according to Uptech. It’s an expensive, time-consuming, and frustrating task you have to turn over to an expert when you wish you could do it yourself.

#FILEMAKER PRO FOR MAC AND FOR WINDOWS HOW TO#

The parts you need might be pricey, but it’s often the costs of the mechanic’s labor that really add up.īuilding an app for your business is like getting your car fixed, especially if you have no idea how to code.

Filemaker pro for mac and for windows